Trikala
When asked about "What form of transportation do you use in your regular (daily/weekly) travels? Why?" younger individuals (25–35 years) frequently cited convenience and the use of private cars, bicycles, and motorbikes, while middle-aged groups (35–45 years and 45–65 years) highlighted buses, and motorbikes as preferred modes of transportation. Older respondents (66+ years) emphasized buses and driving for daily routines. High-income participants gave higher priority on flexibility and convenient routes, including electric cars and motorbikes, while low-income respondents leaned toward cost-efficient options such as buses and walking. Medium-income groups often used motorbikes and shuttles for commuting. Urban area living participants mentioned frequent trips using motorbikes, walking, and cars, while rural respondents highlighted a reliance on private cars, motorbikes, and limited bus services.
Regarding the question, "Do you feel limited in the way you travel?" younger respondents (25–35 years) identified constraints like time, parking, and city center traffic as moderate to severe barriers. Middle-aged participants (35–45 years) noted issues with bike lanes, parking, and space limitations, while older groups (45–65 years) reported challenges related to gas prices and infrastructure. The 66+ age group emphasized shared transport services and parking concerns. High-income respondents pointed to road quality and limited bike lanes as constraints, whereas low-income groups raised concerns about road conditions and affordability. Medium-income participants focused on the quality of bike lanes and city infrastructure, while urban and rural groups both highlighted parking and gas price concerns as major limitations.
In terms of their "Relationship with technology," the 25–35 age group expressed trust and moderate confidence in applications and technology, while middle-aged participants (35–45 years) highlighted their active use of transport-related apps and technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI). Older respondents (45–65 years and 66+ years) showed interest in using apps but mentioned trust issues and concerns about security. High-income groups found technology essential and noted its role in simplifying daily tasks in transportation. Low-income participants discussed challenges related to technology adoption and general internet use, while medium-income groups emphasized privacy concerns and the utility of technology. Urban living participants showed moderate confidence in technology, whereas rural living groups provided limited input, often responding affirmatively to its use.
For the question "Have you ever tried automated transportation and how was it?" younger respondents (25–35 years) highlighted dependency elimination and excitement about the potential of automated buses, though some expressed concerns. Middle-aged participants (35–45 years) described positive experiences with trackable and comfortable automated systems. Older respondents (45–65 years and 66+ years) appreciated automated services but mentioned insecurities about their implementation and job displacement risks. High-income groups noted excitement and curiosity about automated transportation, while low-income respondents shared positive and fun experiences with such systems. Medium-income groups mentioned safety, slowness, and positive experiences overall. Rural participants highlighted the utility of automated buses for connecting villages and urban centers, while urban respondents expressed consistent enthusiasm for automated transport.
In response to "What do you see as the advantages and concerns of self-driving buses?" younger participants (25–35 years) were optimistic about safety and service accuracy but also curious and cautious about new technology. Middle-aged groups (35–45 years) expressed curiosity and excitement but were skeptical about implementation. Older respondents (45–65 years and 66+ years) mentioned indifference and distrust, along with some excitement about the future of autonomous transport. High-income participants focused on confidence and curiosity, whereas low-income respondents highlighted excitement and a mix of skepticism and trust. Medium-income participants emphasized safety and concerns about accidents. Rural living participants mentioned the potential for safer commuting, while urban living groups highlighted sustainability and controlled environments as key advantages.
Lastly, as general remarks, younger individuals (25–35 years) emphasized mobility, accessibility, and affordability as crucial factors. Middle-aged groups (35–45 years) discussed road safety and barriers to adoption, while older respondents (45–65 years) stressed affordability, safety, and security. High-income participants highlighted accessibility and the importance of affordable features in services like CCAM. Low-income respondents emphasized cost efficiency and affordability, while rural groups mentioned the importance of clean, safe, and financially accessible transportation systems. Across all groups, accessibility, affordability, and sustainability were recurring themes.
Charts
